In today’s NFL, many agree that offense is more protected than ever, with quarterbacks and runners shielded by strict rules and heightened protections. Yet, as passing numbers have dipped this season, Mel Kiper argues that offenses need even more help, suggesting a ban on “two-high” defensive schemes that prioritize deep coverage.
Historically, two-high defenses have been part of the game since the forward pass’s rise, but their recent prevalence has sparked debate over their impact on offensive performance. Kiper longs for the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s, a time he views as the “Best of the National Football League,” and believes rule changes should bring back the era’s deep-shot excitement.
However, a closer look reveals that even during those decades, offensive numbers were far from what we see today. In 1965, only one passer averaged over 200 yards per game, and it wasn’t until the late ’70s that a handful of quarterbacks consistently surpassed that mark. The notion of restricting defensive strategies to promote scoring overlooks the adaptability that defines the league.
Implementing such a ban would not only be impractical but would also stifle the creativity that makes football fascinating. Defenders must retain the freedom to position themselves strategically; any attempt to legislate their alignment could lead to convoluted rules with little real impact on gameplay.
Today’s offenses are already finding ways to succeed against the two-high approach. Smart teams, including the Kansas City Chiefs led by Patrick Mahomes, are adjusting their strategies, focusing on short and intermediate routes to exploit defensive weaknesses.
The NFL thrives on its ability to evolve. Rather than imposing outdated rules to cater to nostalgic views of offense, the league should embrace its dynamic nature, allowing teams to innovate and adapt. This ever-changing landscape is what keeps fans engaged and celebrates the creativity of players and coaches alike.
About The Author
